A CLOSER LOOK

THE PROBLEM

When members of our military are too sick or too injured to continue fighting, they must go through the military’s medical separation process (known as IDES). In its current state, there is a dangerous gap in the system being widened by pockets of unchecked power.

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?

It means there are people in positions power within the separation process, with little to no accountability. These people hold the titles of “MEB Chiefs,” which are typically Doctors tasked with reviewing the case file of wounded warriors in their region. On paper they report to DHA, but DHA does not acknowledge this chain of command. This creates a problem when a servicemember needs to appeal to a higher authority. He or she has no where to go.

This means the individuals in charge can make isolated, subjective decisions with little or no explanation. These decisions directly affect the soldier’s career, livelihood, disability rating, future retirement benefits, healthcare, and more.

HOW DID THIS HAPPEN?

It is a brand-new problem brought about by a National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) in the mid-2010s that authorized the creation of the Defense Health Agency (DHA). It took several years for DHA to be established, but as of 2018, they are now responsible for the medical separation process(IDES) in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force.

When active-duty wounded warriors have sought personal remedy through their military branches for breakdowns in IDES, they have been told to seek out DHA. When DHA has been made aware of the claims, they point the finger back at the branches and deny any authority to intervene in the process. Meanwhile, wounded warriors are being fast-tracked right out of their careers with no one to advocate for them.

THE SOLUTION

Someone has to own it. Written directives already designate DHA as the entity in charge, but who will ensure they are doing their job? This is where Congress comes in. Each year, they draft a National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that dictates policy changes within the military. We are working with members of the House and Senate to draft a “Wounded Warrior’s Bill of Rights” to be included in an upcoming NDAA. We tried working the problem from the bottom up, but now we will have to work it from the top down.

The Defense Health Agency (DHA) is the entity tasked with managing the IDES process, but they refuse to acknowledge they actually own it.

One reckless decision can end careers, limit medical care, and effectively dismiss years of honorable service without regard to a soldier’s potential to recover.

We believe that powerful decisions like these require safeguards in place for the soldier. It’snot enough to have an org chart on paper – there must be checks and balances in place.

During our own journey through IDES, we personally shed light on this problem in multiple meetings and communications with top leaders in DHA and the Department of Defense. Our hope was that they would own the problem and take immediate action for the sake of those that would come behind us. Instead, they all sympathized with the problem but looked elsewhere to place the blame, offering no solution of their own.

Arc of Justice will commit its time, resources, and expertise to drafting these safeguards that will reform the system.

The medical separation process was never intended to be harmful to our servicemembers. It was designed to evaluate their ability to remain on active duty and if they were found unfit, it was intended to help them successfully transition to a less demanding job on the outside.

Glossary